A Listmint alternative with one pool of credits
Listmint returns catch_all_valid and catch_all_invalid as explicit result codes, which is a genuinely good design. The friction is the metering: catch-all verifications come out of a separate, smaller allowance, so the part of your list that needs the most work is the part you run out of first. Giggal.ai bills catch-all from the same credits as everything else.
Bottom line
- Both resolve catch-all
- Listmint returns catch_all_valid or catch_all_invalid. We return valid or invalid.
- Metering
- Listmint splits standard and catch-all credits into two pools. We use one pool, at 1.5 credits per catch-all.
- Price transparency
- Listmint builds its prices in the browser, so we could not verify them. Ours are published: $9.90 per 10,000.
- Gateways
- We verify behind 15 named secure email gateways. Listmint does not publish SEG support.
How Giggal.ai verifies catch-all addresses
Listmint and Giggal.ai agree on the important thing: an accept-all domain deserves a real answer, not a label. Listmint expresses it as catch_all_valid and catch_all_invalid, which is easy to filter on and worth copying. The practical difference is what happens when a list is mostly catch-all. On Listmint that drains a separate allowance sized smaller than the standard one. On Giggal.ai a catch-all costs 1.5 credits inside a run, or 2 standalone, from the same balance, and there is no second pool to run dry. Giggal.ai also resolves mailboxes behind 15 named secure email gateways, which Listmint does not advertise.
| Result | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Deliverable | The mailbox exists and will accept mail |
| Undeliverable | The mailbox does not exist |
| Risky | The address exists but carries deliverability risk |
| Unknown | We could not verify the address, and the credit is refunded |
Listmint pricing vs Giggal.ai
Listmint splits its allowance into standard credits and a separate, smaller pool of catch-all credits. Its pricing page assembles those figures in the browser, so we could not read them from the source and we would rather leave the rows blank than publish a number we did not verify. Giggal.ai publishes a flat list: $9.90 for 10,000, $76 for 100,000, $680 for a million, bought once, credits never expire, and catch-all comes out of the same balance at 1.5 credits.
| Volume | Giggal.ai | Listmint |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | $9.90 | Not published |
| 100,000 | $76 | Not published |
| 1,000,000 | $680 | Not published |
Listmint splits its allowance into standard credits and a separate, smaller pool of catch-all credits, and its pricing page builds those figures in the browser, so we could not read them directly. We would rather show nothing than publish a number we did not verify. Giggal.ai figures are one-time pay-as-you-go.
Listmint pricing checked on 21 August 2026. Prices may have changed, see Listmint’s pricing page.
Listmint vs Giggal.ai
| Giggal.ai | Listmint | |
|---|---|---|
| Price at 10,000 credits | $9.90 | Not published |
| Catch-all verification | Yes | Yes |
| Catch-all pricing | 1.5 credits in the same run, 2 credits standalone | Billed from a separate catch-all credit pool |
| SEG verifier | 15 gateways | No |
| Credit expiry | Credits never expire, with no condition. | Not published |
| Free tier | 1,000 credits, no card, usable on bulk | Not published |
| Charges for unknown results | No | - |
| Accuracy figure | Claims 98.5% | - |
Listmint’s pricing renders client-side and could not be read directly, so its rows are blank rather than estimated. Check listmint.io/pricing for current figures.
Try it on your own list
- 1Export a list you already checked in Listmint.
- 2Run it here on the 1,000 free credits. No card.
- 3Look at how far 1,000 credits goes on a catch-all heavy list, against Listmint’s separate catch-all allowance.
Frequently asked questions
Yes, and they are close on the core idea. Both resolve catch-all addresses to a real result rather than labelling them. Giggal.ai bills catch-all from a single credit balance at 1.5 credits, publishes a flat price list starting at $9.90 per 10,000, and also verifies behind 15 named secure email gateways.
Functionally very little. Listmint splits the catch-all case into its own result codes, Giggal.ai folds it into the same valid or invalid result as any other address. Both tell you whether the mailbox is real.
Because roughly 30% of a B2B list sits on catch-all domains. When catch-all is metered separately and sized smaller than the standard pool, that segment is where you run out first. A single balance means the mix of your list does not change what you can finish.
$9.90 for 10,000, $76 for 100,000 and $680 for a million, bought once with no subscription. Credits never expire, and catch-all costs 1.5 credits inside a run or 2 standalone.
Yes. 1,000 free credits, no card, on a bulk upload. Run a catch-all heavy segment and compare the results row by row.
One balance, one price, catch-all included
1,000 free credits, no card required.